A 23-year-old founder was once accosted by the CEO of Meta, Mark Zuckerberg, to give up his startup for a whopping 3 billion dollars. That would be enough money to be set up for life. The young CEO turned down the mouth-watering offer, preferring to remain in control of his newly formed company. Today, his company is worth far more than what it was many years ago. That founder is Evan Spiegel and his company, Snapchat, was just 3 years old at the time the offer was made. 💡
A Buyout is when an entity acquires a controlling interest in a company either by purchasing it in full or owning more than 50% of its shares. However, the term acquisition is most commonly used instead of buyout when talking about exit strategies.
Spiegel’s decision might have paid off in the long run, but not all founders get so lucky. This is why the majority of founders exit their company at some point.
Demis Hassabis the founder of AI company DeepMind made a critical decision to sell his company. The question was, who was he selling to? Two of the most powerful tech companies were interested in acquiring DeepMind - Facebook and Google. In the end, Google won the bid, acquiring DeepMind for 400 million dollars in 2014.
This wasn’t bad for a Startup launched in 2010. In a recent interview, Mark Zuckerberg pointed out that Hassabis had played both companies to get a better deal, which he did. However, Hassabis wasn’t after the money alone, but the incredible computational power that partnering with Google provided.
This must have also influenced his decision to sell to Google and not Facebook.
....we decided in 2014 to join forces with Google at the time because we could see that a lot more compute was going to be needed. Obviously, Google has the most computers and had the most computers in the world. That was the obvious home for us to be able to focus on pushing the research as fast as possible.
Having an exit strategy is not a bad idea and sometimes, it is better to exit than not to. Although founders exit for many reasons, financial difficulties sit at the very top. When startup founders are cash-strapped and can’t raise funds, it makes sense to sell to a buyer who has the financial resources to keep the business running. This could be an individual or a company.
However, there are key things founders must consider when deciding to sell. I’ll break it into four parts- When, Who, Why, and What
Every entrepreneur understands the importance of timing. For example when launching a new product, if you do that too early, you risk being rejected by the market that may not be ready for that product. Launch too late and you risk being beaten by another competitor.
It is the same when exiting. Timing can determine how much leverage you have during an acquisition. If you give up too early, you may not have enough leverage to negotiate better terms during an acquisition, but if you wait too long, your company may have past its peak phase and again, you lost your negotiating power.
When a company decides to acquire a startup, one of the biggest concerns is the fact that the more established company has a strong organizational culture. To the outside world, the deal may be too good to ignore. But founders have to think beyond the money offered. They need to consider if they are selling to the right entity, otherwise, there will be consequences.
During an acquisition, key employees from the startup are often retained under the new management. But if there’s a marked difference in organizational culture, then the rate of employee turnover will likely increase. To avoid this, founders need to know who is making the offer.
A quick research about the acquirer will tell you who they are and what they stand for. You can also talk to other founders or employees previously acquired by the company to get a better understanding of what the organization’s culture is like, and if it resonates with that of your startup. This will shed more light on who the acquirer is.
Asides from organisational culture, acquisition can provide founders with resources like the computational power in the case of DeepMind. Therefore it will make sense to sell to a company that has the resources needed.
Acquisition happens for several reasons. Knowing just why another company is interested in your startup can be leveraged for better terms and conditions during acquisition. Here are four common reasons for an acquisition.
A new product and niche customer base - this will be attractive to a major company looking to break into a new market. Rather than compete, it is both time-saving and cost-effective to acquire the startup.
A new product but a similar customer base as the acquirer - breaking into a market with a new product puts a startup under the scope of companies operating in the market, especially since they share the same customer base.
The same product and customer base - customer loyalty can be hard to earn. So when a startup wins over customers from major companies in the same industry, while selling similar products or services, they become a target for acquisition.
A niche customer base but similar products/services - satisfying a niche group of customers within an industry means there is a market gap. Startups can often take advantage of this and if successfully done, it can become a good reason for an acquisition.
Remember, any of these reasons is a strong leverage for the startup to negotiate for better terms and better pay.
If you are satisfied with the Who and Why, the next thing to consider is what to ask for. This can be tricky since money is often the first thing on the table. But as I pointed out earlier, money is just one of many factors to be considered during an acquisition. Focusing solely on the money can be detrimental to the future of the acquisition. You don’t want everything crumbling down a few months or years after your startup has been acquired. The terms and conditions of the acquisition should be well negotiated using the “why”, as leverage. Key things to ask for are - Employee retention, employee pay, compensation, titles, and a new leadership structure.
As a founder looking to exit through acquisition, ask yourself, Is this the right time? Is this the right company? What makes my company attractive? What can I get from this? These questions will guide you in making the right decisions on whether to sell or not.
Recommended Reading - Negative Cashflow? Here Are 5 Ways To manage It
A buyout or acquisition occurs when an individual or organization acquires controlling interest in a company, either by purchasing all shares or a majority stake. In the startup world, acquisitions typically happen when a larger or more established company purchases the startup to take advantage of its technology, customer base, or market position. The acquiring company may continue to run the startup as a separate business unit or integrate it into its existing operations.
Timing is critical when considering an acquisition. A startup founder should sell when the company has reached a point where: Growth is plateauing, and the company needs additional resources (financial or technological) to scale further. Cash flow issues arise, making it difficult to sustain operations without external support. Market demand for your company is high, which increases negotiation power for better terms. However, waiting too long or selling too early can decrease leverage and overall valuation.
Founders need to research the buyer thoroughly before proceeding with an acquisition. Key considerations include: Organizational culture compatibility: Can your team thrive under the new management? Access to resources: Will the acquisition provide technology, capital, or personnel you didn't have? Reputation of the buyer: Does the buyer have a track record of successful acquisitions? Engaging with other founders who have sold to the same company can provide critical insights.
Understanding the buyer's motivation can help founders negotiate better terms. Some common reasons include: Access to a niche customer base. Acquisition of innovative technology or products. Entry into a new market or geographical region. Elimination of competition within the same space. Each of these motivations represents a point of leverage for founders during negotiations.
Beyond the purchase price, founders should negotiate: Employee retention and salaries. Leadership roles in the acquiring company (if they plan to stay post-acquisition). Stock incentives or bonuses for staff. Operational autonomy for their team or division. Intellectual property rights. Addressing these points ensures a smooth transition and operational continuity.
Selling a startup comes with inherent risks, including: Loss of control over strategic decisions. Potential culture clashes leading to employee turnover. Unrealized long-term growth potential if the company is undervalued. Integration challenges that may affect product development or service delivery. Thorough due diligence and clear terms in the acquisition agreement can mitigate these risks.
Founders can secure favorable terms for their employees by negotiating: Competitive pay packages and bonuses tied to the acquisition. Career progression opportunities within the acquiring company. Retention of their team's roles and titles. Alignment between the two companies' cultures to maintain a positive work environment. Ensuring employees remain motivated post-acquisition will help sustain productivity and innovation.
A significant difference in corporate cultures can lead to high employee turnover. If the acquiring company's management style, values, or operations clash with those of the startup, employees may feel disoriented or undervalued. To avoid future issues, founders should assess cultural alignment early and advocate for integration strategies that preserve morale and identity.
DeepMind's co-founder Demis Hassabis chose to sell to Google because of Google's superior computational resources, which were essential for pushing the boundaries of AI research. While Facebook also made an offer, Hassabis believed Google's infrastructure was better suited to support DeepMind's long-term vision of advancing AI technology.
Snapchat is a prime example. Evan Spiegel refused a $3 billion buyout offer from Facebook when Snapchat was just three years old. While the decision was risky, it ultimately paid off, as the company grew exponentially in value in subsequent years. This illustrates the importance of carefully assessing long-term growth opportunities before agreeing to sell.